Forthcoming

Biomechanical impact analysis of implant positioning in lumbar interbody fusion by the finite element method

Le Duy Nguyen Ho, Thi Hoang Thuy Le, Thuc Tri Dang, Truc Tam Vu, Truong Tich Thien
Author affiliations

Authors

  • Le Duy Nguyen Ho \(^1\) Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet street, Dien Hong ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    \(^3\) Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vo Truong Toan street, VNU-HCM Urban Area, Quarter 33, Linh Xuan ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Thi Hoang Thuy Le \(^1\) Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet street, Dien Hong ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    \(^3\) Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vo Truong Toan street, VNU-HCM Urban Area, Quarter 33, Linh Xuan ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
  • Thuc Tri Dang \(^2\) Department of Engineering Mechanics, Faculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet street, Dien Hong ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    \(^3\) Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vo Truong Toan street, VNU-HCM Urban Area, Quarter 33, Linh Xuan ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8013-6503
  • Truc Tam Vu \(^4\) Department of Spinal Surgery B, Hospital for Traumatology and Orthopedics, 929 Tran Hung Dao street, Cho Quan ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7234-4287
  • Truong Tich Thien \(^2\) Department of Engineering Mechanics, Faculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet street, Dien Hong ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    \(^3\) Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vo Truong Toan street, VNU-HCM Urban Area, Quarter 33, Linh Xuan ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3371-8890

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15625/2525-2518/22015

Keywords:

finite element model, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, biomechanical stability, cage positioning

Abstract

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) is a fusion technique in spinal surgeries reserved for chronic conditions requiring stabilization e.g. lumbar spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis, especially when conservative treatments fail. The procedure involves removing the pathological disc material and putting a spacer with morselized bone graft in the disc space via the transforaminal pathway in order to promote interbody bony fusion. The whole construction is stabilized posteriorly by pedicle screw fixation. However, the conventional TLIF technique possessed several drawbacks including cage subsidence and cage protrusion, due to the posterior position of the cage within the disc space and modifications have been proposed in the effort to reduce the mentioned problems. Selecting pedicle screw length is also a topic to debate, when no clear consensus has been established regarding that matter. Therefore, this study uses Finite Element (FE) model under physiological axial compression to investigate the screw length and cage positioning effects on the bone and instruments. This model accounts for the structural interactions between the cage, pedicle screws, and surrounding bone tissue. Our findings highlight the novel insight that anterior cage placement reduces the risk of cage subsidence and improves load distribution. Additionally, the study demonstrates that screw tips should extend beyond the center of the cage to enhance load transfer efficiency and reduce stress on the fixation system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ozgur B. M., Yoo K., Rodriguez G., Taylor W. R. - Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Eur. Spine. J., 14(9) (2005) 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0941-3.

2. Mobbs R. J., Phan K., Malham G., Seex K., Rao P. J. - Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J. Spine Surg., 1(1) (2015) 2-18.

3. Karikari I. O., Isaacs R. E. - Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine, 35(26S) (2010) S294-S301. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022ddc.

4. Polly D. W., Jr., Klemme W. R., Cunningham B. W., Burnette J. B., Haggerty C. J., Oda I. - The biomechanical significance of anterior column support in a simulated single-level spinal fusion. J. Spinal Disord, 13(1) (2000) 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200002000-00012.

5. Materials A. Z. O. - Titanium Alloys - Physical Properties. https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=1341 (accessed 16 October 2024).

6. Materials A. Z. O. - Stainless Steel - Grade 304 (UNS S30400). https://www.azom.com/properties.aspx?ArticleID=965 (accessed 16 October 2024).

7. Materials A. Z. O. - Accelerated Ageing and Characterisation of UHMWPE used in Orthopaedic Implants. https://www.azom.com/properties.aspx?ArticleID=909 (accessed 16 October 2024).

8. Weisse B., Aiyangar A. K., Affolter C., Gander R., Terrasi G. P., Ploeg H. - Determination of the translational and rotational stiffnesses of an L4-L5 functional spinal unit using a specimen-specific finite element model. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 13 (2012) 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.002.

9. Ahn Y. H., Chen W. M., Lee K. Y., Park K. W., Lee S. J. - Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices. Biomed. Mater., 3(4) (2008) 044101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/3/4/044101.

10. Guo H. Z., Zhang S. C., Guo D. Q., Ma Y. H., Yuan K., Li Y. X., Peng J. C., Li J. L., Liang D., Tang Y. C. - Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screws with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 21(1) (2020) 460. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03498-6.

11. Jiang R., Liu G. M., Bai H. T., Wang T. B., Wu H., Jia Y. Y., Luo Y. G. - Age-related differences in the biological parameters of vertebral cancellous bone from Chinese women. Chin. Med. J., 126(20) (2013) 3828-3832. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20131464.

12. Ulrich D., Van Rietbergen B., Laib A., Ruegsegger P. - The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone, 25(1) (1999) 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00098-8.

13. Kaleli N., Sarac D., Külünk S., Öztürk Ö. - Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J. Prosthet. Dent., 119(3) (2018) 437-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.008.

14. Zhang H., Hao D., Sun H., He S., Wang B., Hu H., Zhang Y. - Biomechanical effects of direction-changeable cage positions on lumbar spine: a finite element study. Am. J. Transl. Res., 12(2) (2020) 389-396.

Downloads

Published

06-03-2026

How to Cite

[1]L. D. N. Ho, T. H. T. Le, T. T. Dang, T. T. Vu, and T. T. Thien, “Biomechanical impact analysis of implant positioning in lumbar interbody fusion by the finite element method”, Vietnam J. Sci. Technol., Mar. 2026.

Issue

Section

Mechanical Engineering - Mechatronics

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.